government should spend more money putting in more works of art雅思寫作藝術類8分范文

雅思寫作藝術類題目

Some people believe that the government should spend more money putting in more works of art like paintings and statues in cities to make them better places to live in.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

一些人認為政府應該加大投入在城市中添加諸如畫作和雕塑之類的藝術品，以讓它變得更加適合居住。你在多大程度上同意或者不同意這一看法?

雅思寫作藝術類范文

開頭段

Some feel governments should invest more in public art in cities to boost the quality of life.Personally,I am in disagreement with this idea because it has little actual importance for the average citizen.

一些人認為政府應該在城市中投資修建更多的公共藝術品以提升生活質量。我個人不同意這一觀點，因為它對普通民眾影響有限。

藝術品的作用

On the one hand,public art beautifies a city.A city stripped of all art gives off the dreary appearance of being purely for utilitarian value and the daily rigour of work.In contrast,cities that have invested heavily in public art,such as New York City,offer their residents a beautiful and inspiring home.A child who sees sculptures and murals walking home will feel the city is a nicer place to live and workers passing by works of art will have some emotional relief from the demands of the day.This not only builds up the character of urban areas for local inhabitants and instils a sense of pride,but also attracts tourists and professional artists to the city,both of which contribute to a vibrant city.

一方面，公共藝術能夠美化城市。被剝去所有藝術的城市會因純粹的功利價值和日常的艱苦工作而呈現出沉悶的景色。相比之下，在公共藝術上投入大筆資金的城市，如紐約，為其居民提供美麗的環(huán)境?；丶衣飞峡吹降袼芎捅诋嫷膬和瘯X得城市是個居住的好地方，而經過藝術品的員工會從一天繁忙的生活中得以喘息。這不僅會構建當地居民的性格，讓他們感到驕傲，而且還吸引游客和專業(yè)藝術家。這兩者都會塑造一個生機勃勃的城市。

其他領域更加重要

Nonetheless,public art has little quantifiable positive value.Most city-dwellers are too engrossed in their hectic schedules to notice public art.This art,therefore,means nothing to most locals,while also diverting an outsized share of a city’s budget.There are other more vital areas requiring development such as high-end infrastructure,well-rounded healthcare systems,and modern recreational facilities.Moreover,the public space used to house these works of art cannot be used for practical purposes including critical public facilities like restrooms,bus stops or parks.Those who rely on these other facilities will have more trouble finding them and their quality of life may be somewhat impacted by a preference for art.

然而，公共藝術的積極價值有限。大多數城市居民忙于工作，注意不到公共藝術。因此，這些藝術對于大多數當地居民來說毫無意義，卻會占用一座城市的預算。其他更為重要的領域需要投資，如良好的基礎設施，健全的衛(wèi)生系統(tǒng)，現代休閑設施等。此外，用于陳列這些藝術品的公共空間無法用于實際目的，如休息室、公交車站或公園這樣的重要公共設施。那些依賴以上設施的人會更難找到它們，而他們的生活質量也會受到偏愛藝術的影響。

結論

Despite the aesthetic value of public art,government bodies should focus more on urban issues that truly matter to their constituents.There must be a degree of balance but it should always tip more towards pragmatism.

盡管公共藝術的審美價值，政府機構應該更多關注真正影響其選區(qū)居民的問題。兩者之間應該存在一定的平衡，但它應該更加傾向于實用主義。

>> 雅思 托福 免費課程學習，AI量身規(guī)劃讓英語學習不再困難<<